“Good Works” vs. “Dead Works”

ten commandmentsby Alan Martin

“Good works” vs. “works of the Law”. We must not confuse the importance of maintaining good works with the equally vital truth that we are not to pursue a righteousness based upon “works of the Law”. Consider Paul’s very strong exhortation to Titus – “This is a faithful word and concerning these things I desire you to strongly affirm, in order that those who have believed in God should maintain good works.”

“Maintain” here is a word meaning – “to practice as a profession.” These good works that we are to practice are not “works of the law”, but acts of compassion that flow out of faith working through love – especially “the love of the brethren.” Paul reaffirmed the urgency of maintaining good works as he closed his letter to Titus – “And let our people learn to practice as a profession (maintain) good works unto urgent needs.” Since Paul urged that all believers be taught to maintain good works, we must not allow misguided men take away from this urgency by confusing good works of faith with “dead works of the Law.”

Paul taught that Jesus came to redeem us from all lawlessness – and to purify to Himself a people zealous of good works. In light of this truth, never let men negate the importance of maintaining good works. These good works have nothing to do with “works of the Law”, they are “works of faith” that flow out of brotherly love. We are not saved “BY” maintaining good works, but we are saved “TO” practice them as a profession!

Maintaining the good works of meeting the urgent needs of our brethren is “a trustworthy saying” that Titus and the rest of us are to take thought to strongly affirm. May we become just as zealous for maintaining good works as Paul urged Titus to make those saints under his care!

HATH GOD SAID? – EMERGENT CHURCH THEOLOGY

The labels Emergent Church, Emerging Church, Emergence Christianity, and New Christianity all imply innovative and progressive understandings of Orthodox Christianity. Like nailing jello to a wall, many have attempted to understand and define the Emergent movement only to be frustrated and confused.

At the heart of the Emerging movement is the worldview of postmodernism which teaches that truth is relative and subjective. This FREE book by Elliott Nesch, Hath God Said? – Emergent Church Theology, demonstrates how postmodernism is incompatible with a biblical worldview of absolute truth and the authority of the Scriptures on various topics including feminism, homosexuality, hell, mysticism, eschatology, Jesus Christ and the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and more.

In Hath God Said? – Emergent Church Theology, the teachings of the Emergent movement are exposed in light of Scripture. Also by comparing early Church writings with Emergent writings, it becomes evident that the Emerging Church is not preaching the faith once delivered to the saints.

WHAT WAS EARLY CHRISTIANITY LIKE?

early churchby David Bercot of Scroll Publishing
The three distinguishing marks of the early church were: separation from the world, unconditional love, and childlike obedience to the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Separation From the World

No one can serve two masters,” declared Jesus to his disciples (Matt. 6:24). However, Christians have spent the greater portion of the past two millenniums apparently trying to prove Jesus wrong. We have told ourselves that we can indeed have both-the things of God and the things of this world. Many of us live our lives no differently than do conservative non-Christians, except for the fact that we attend church regularly each week. We watch the same entertainment. We share the same concerns about the problems of this world. And we are frequently just as involved in the world’s commercial and materialistic pursuits. Often, our being “not of this world” exists in theory more than in practice.

But the church was not originally like that. The first Christians lived under a completely different set of principles and values than the rest of mankind. They rejected the world’s entertainment, honors, and riches. They were already citizens of another kingdom, and they listened to the voice of a different Master. This was as true of the second century church as it was of the first.

The Letter to Diognetus, the work of an unknown author, written in about 130, describes Christians to the Romans as follows: “They dwell in their own countries simply as sojourners…. They are in the flesh, but they do not live after the flesh. They pass their days on earth, but they are citizens of heaven. They obey the prescribed laws, and at the same time, they surpass the laws by their lives. They love all men but are persecuted by all. They are unknown and condemned. They are put to death, but [will be] restored to life. They are poor, yet they make many rich. They possess few things; yet, they abound in all. They are dishonored, but in their very dishonor are glorified…. And those who hate them are unable to give any reason for their hatred.” The Letter to Diognetus can be found in the Ante-Nicene Fathers.

Continue reading “WHAT WAS EARLY CHRISTIANITY LIKE?” »